Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) Earnings
Veeva Systems Inc. is expected to report next earnings on November 25, 2026 (in NaN days), with a consensus EPS estimate of $2.34. VEEV has beaten EPS estimates in 11 of its last 12 reported quarters (average surprise -2.2% over the last four).
| Report date | EPS est | EPS actual | Surprise | Revenue | Rev. surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | $2.23 | $2.35 | +5.4% | $928M | +2.5% |
| Jun 3, 2026 | $2.14 | $2.24 | +4.7% | $883M | +2.9% |
| Mar 4, 2026 | $1.94 | $1.49 | -23.2% | $836M | +3.1% |
| Nov 20, 2025 | $1.96 | $2.04 | +4.3% | $811M | +2.2% |
| Aug 27, 2025 | $1.90 | $1.99 | +4.5% | $789M | +2.6% |
| May 28, 2025 | $1.75 | $1.97 | +12.8% | $759M | +4.0% |
| Mar 5, 2025 | $1.60 | $1.74 | +8.4% | $721M | +2.9% |
| Dec 5, 2024 | $1.58 | $1.75 | +10.5% | $699M | +2.0% |
| Aug 28, 2024 | $1.53 | $1.62 | +5.8% | $676M | +1.2% |
| May 30, 2024 | $1.41 | $1.50 | +6.2% | $650M | +1.8% |
| Feb 29, 2024 | $1.30 | $1.38 | +6.2% | $631M | +1.5% |
| Dec 6, 2023 | $1.28 | $1.34 | +4.7% | $617M | +0.1% |
Source: company filings + earnings calendar. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
Earnings call summary
Q2 FY2027 · August 26, 2026
AI summary of management’s prepared remarks and analyst Q&A. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.
Management highlights
- **AI and Falcon Strategy**: Management highlighted exceptional progress in AI, specifically with 'Viva Falcon' (agentic labor). There is high customer interest due to clear cost savings and efficiency gains. Falcon is positioned as a structural advantage, combining agentic labor with core applications. - **Product Execution**: The company delivered results ahead of guidance. CRM achieved record results, with subscription growth up ~13% YoY. Commercial subs showed double-digit growth even excluding Cross6. - **Aspen Initiative**: Aspen is described as an early-stage startup within Veeva, focused on horizontal CRM with a modern tech stack. It is agile, has a small investment footprint relative to Veeva’s scale, and is targeting early adopters with rapid iteration cycles. - **Market Position & Wins**: Veeva maintains market leadership in CRM, aiming for >70% share. Recent wins include Lilly and Biogen selecting Vault CRM. The company sees opportunities to win back customers who previously chose Salesforce but are experiencing implementation delays. - **China Business**: China operations are profitable and growing, leveraging a local tech stack while maintaining synergy with global products like PromoMats. The business serves both local needs and global customers with HQs outside China. - **Consulting Services**: Tech-enabled consulting is becoming more efficient, reducing implementation costs and increasing the value of software applications. This shift favors specialized, tech-enabled service providers over generalists.
Guidance
- **FY27 Guidance Maintained/Revised Upward**: Management raised guidance again in Q2. Investments in new markets like Falcon are factored into the updated FY27 guidance. - **No Further Near-Term Updates**: No additional guidance or performance updates will be provided until the next public forum. - **Long-term Trajectory**: Confidence remains high for R&D growth through 2030 driven by new strategic products (EDC, ECOA, RTSM, Safety, LIMS), though these are currently in early stages with shifting S-curves.
Segment performance
Note: The provided transcript does not contain specific financial data broken down by product segment (e.g., absolute revenue or percentage contribution for CRM, R&D, Commercial, etc.). The CEO stated that Q2 was the 'best CRM quarter ever' and noted strong broad-based growth across Commercial (CRM, Content, Data, Cross6) and R&D. Financial highlights mentioned include total revenue of $928 million and non-GAAP operating income of $416 million.
Risks & headwinds
- **Execution Risk in New Ventures**: Success of Aspen and Falcon depends on execution capability rather than market size. These are new motions for Veeva (agentic labor) and require careful product development and customer adoption. - **Competitive Pressure from Salesforce**: While Veeva is optimistic about win-backs, some large customers initially selected Salesforce. Delays in Salesforce projects present an opportunity, but competition remains intense. - **Regulatory and Operational Hurdles for AI**: Agentic labor is non-deterministic, requiring robust guardrails and human-in-the-loop protocols. Regulatory acceptance and proving safety/compliance are critical hurdles. - **Data Cloud Growth Pace**: Data cloud growth is described as a 'long, slow grind' rather than rapid acceleration, requiring significant effort to clean and integrate reference data across downstream systems.
Analyst Q&A
Q: Analyst asked about customer mentality regarding adopting new AI offerings like Falcon amidst busy pipelines.
A: Peter Gassner stated there is very high interest in Falcon because it addresses high-priority goals like quick cost savings and compliance. He noted Veeva is the 'rate limiter' in getting the product ready for early adopters, but demand is strong enough that it would 'fly off the shelf' if fully live immediately.
Q: Analyst asked if the selling cycle for Falcon involves different buyers (e.g., HR vs IT) and budget shifts.
A: Gassner explained that sales cycles may actually be easier as IT involvement is lower; buyers are often heads of business units (e.g., Safety, Clinical). Since Veeva already sells into these business-side teams for core apps, the buyer overlap is nearly 100%, leveraging existing trust and relationships.
Q: Analyst asked about customers transitioning away from Veeva CRM to Salesforce and potential win-backs.
A: Gassner expressed optimism about winning back some customers, particularly those facing delays and issues with their Salesforce implementations. He noted that many large customers view Veeva as a 'Plan B' and are open to switching once their Salesforce projects struggle, with most win-back activity expected in 2027-2028.
Q: Analyst asked about the readiness gates for Falcon and human-in-the-loop requirements.
A: Gassner compared agentic labor to human labor, emphasizing the need for training and guardrails. He stated that customers are now familiar with AI concepts, so Veeva doesn't need to educate them extensively. The focus is on scaling repeatable motions, and initial tests show agents performing well against human benchmarks.
Q: Analyst asked about the pricing model for Aspen and how it compares to traditional software pricing.
A: Gassner described Aspen’s pricing as simpler and more predictable, modeled after AWS with a base user fee ($50/user/month) plus usage overages for compute/data. This approach aims to avoid complex discounting and edition hierarchies, offering transparency and predictability which large enterprises prefer.