Parsons Corporation (PSN) Earnings

Parsons Corporation is expected to report next earnings on November 4, 2026 (in NaN days), with a consensus EPS estimate of $0.81. PSN has beaten EPS estimates in 10 of its last 12 reported quarters (average surprise -18.1% over the last four).

Next earnings
Nov 4, 2026in NaN days
EPS est $0.81 · Revenue est $1.6B
Track record
Beat EPS in 10 of 12 quarters
Avg surprise -18.1% (last 4 quarters)
Earnings history
Report dateEPS estEPS actualSurpriseRevenueRev. surprise
Jul 29, 2026$0.76$-0.06-107.9%$1.6B-1.5%
Apr 29, 2026$0.70$0.79+12.9%$1.5B-0.5%
Nov 5, 2025$0.73$0.86+18.3%$1.6B-4.4%
Aug 6, 2025$0.75$0.78+4.6%$1.6B-6.0%
Apr 30, 2025$0.74$0.78+4.8%$1.6B-12.1%
Feb 19, 2025$0.92$0.78-15.3%$1.7B+1.4%
Oct 30, 2024$0.79$0.95+19.6%$1.8B+3.7%
Jul 31, 2024$0.69$0.84+20.9%$1.7B+7.4%
May 1, 2024$0.62$0.70+13.1%$1.5B-0.4%
Feb 14, 2024$0.63$0.69+9.5%$1.5B+12.7%
Nov 1, 2023$0.60$0.69+15.2%$1.4B+11.5%
Aug 2, 2023$0.49$0.63+28.8%$1.4B+19.8%

Source: company filings + earnings calendar. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.

Earnings call summary

Q2 FY2026 · July 29, 2026

AI summary of management’s prepared remarks and analyst Q&A. For informational purposes only — not investment advice.

Management highlights

- Strategic Portfolio Reshaping * Exited two non-strategic remote federal contracts that no longer met risk and profitability criteria, resulting in a $77 million Q2 2026 loss; a signed letter of intent for novation is in place, with closing expected in Q3 2026. * Divested two CETA (advisory) federal contracts to resolve a potential organizational conflict of interest with a growing intelligence community development customer, generating a $19 million gain. This exit unlocks access to an 8-10x larger higher-margin development opportunity for the firm. * No longer pursues non-managing joint venture consortium projects (a strategy changed in 2019), and has permanently adjusted operations to only accept work where the firm has clear execution control. - Operational and Win Highlights * Total Q2 bookings grew 24% year-over-year to $1.9 billion, with an overall consolidated book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x. Total backlog at quarter end was $9.3 billion, with 71% funded ($6.6 billion funded backlog, up 6% year-over-year). * Secured five contracts exceeding $100 million in Q2, including a $514 million MDA option for Integrated Missile Defense System work (including Golden Dome), $400 million in defense/intelligence OTAs, a $245 million Navy space/cybersecurity IDIQ, a $184 million Navy intelligence program IDIQ, and a $161 million Canadian Giant Mine remediation construction management contract. * 4 of the quarter's $100M+ wins incorporated AI, and 10 of 13 $100M+ wins secured over the last three quarters include advanced AI, leveraging the firm's 20+ years of operational AI experience across autonomous systems, cyber, counter-UAS, and smart mobility. * Acquisitions have delivered clear synergies: Sealing Tech contributed to multiple recent wins, Chesapeake led the $400 million OTA wins, Black Signal expanded classified access, and Maxotor's biometrics capabilities enabled a large Q4 2025 classified win. * Products now make up 10% of the federal business, with 30-40% projected growth for 2027, and products are expected to bolster long-term bottom-line results. - Market Positioning * Aligned with key U.S. federal priorities: the proposed $1.15 trillion FY2027 U.S. base defense budget aligns directly with Parsons' core strengths in missile defense, cyber, space, counter-UAS, electronic warfare, and facilities modernization. Only 44% of IIJA infrastructure funds have been spent to date, with proposed new surface transportation authorization providing sustained funding for the firm's North American critical infrastructure pipeline. * Middle East business delivered 10% organic growth, 1.1x book-to-bill, and strong profitability despite ongoing geopolitical conflict, with demand sustained by long-term regional investment priorities in transportation, urban development, and new security opportunities.

Guidance

- The full-year 2026 revenue guidance range was revised downward to $6.2 - $6.5 billion, with the midpoint lowered by $300 million. The breakdown of the midpoint reduction is: $85 million from planned portfolio divestitures, $125 million from slower-than-expected ramp of North American critical infrastructure (half of this reduction is low-margin pass-through revenue that benefits long-term segment margins), and $90 million from federal contract timing delays, including a protest on a large awarded contract and delayed funding on recent wins. - Full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance was revised to $500 - $560 billion, with the midpoint lowered by $115 million. This reduction largely reflects the $118 million in Q2 2026 non-recurring charges, partially offset by favorable underlying margin trends, cost controls, and strong program performance across the core portfolio. Despite the $200 million+ revenue reduction, core underlying EBITDA performance has outperformed expectations. - Full-year 2026 operating cash flow guidance was revised to $430 - $490 million, with the midpoint lowered by $40 million due to divestiture impacts and revenue timing. - Capital expenditure for full-year 2026 is expected to remain ~1.5% of total revenue, and the full-year free cash conversion target of >100% is reaffirmed. - Long-term, management expects mid-single digits or better annual revenue growth off 2026 base results, with continued 10-20 basis points of annual margin expansion, building on 110 basis points of expansion over the past two years. Second half 2026 sequential revenue growth is expected: ~3% from Q2 to Q3, with a small additional increase from Q3 to Q4, driven by seasonal and new business ramp.

Segment performance

Parsons operates two core business segments. For Q2 2026 (normalized basis): 1. **Critical Infrastructure**: Revenue grew 5% year-over-year, with 4% organic growth and inorganic contributions from the Applied Sciences acquisition. Organic growth was led by a 10% organic revenue increase in the Middle East. Reported adjusted EBITDA was $97 million, an 18% increase year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 140 basis points to 11.9%, driving the segment's adjusted EBITDA margin contribution of 59.6% of the company's total normalized adjusted EBITDA. The segment achieved a 1.1x book-to-bill ratio, marking its 23rd consecutive quarter at or above 1.0x. 2. **Federal Solutions**: Revenue increased 11% year-over-year, with 2% organic growth excluding the confidential contract (total organic revenue including the confidential contract fell 12% year-over-year). Growth came from the space and missile defense market, transportation markets, and accretive acquisitions of Altamira and CTI. Normalized adjusted EBITDA was $64 million, a 5% decline year-over-year, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 8.2%. The segment's adjusted EBITDA margin contribution is 40.4% of the company's total normalized adjusted EBITDA. Bookings grew 51% year-over-year, delivering a 1.3x book-to-bill ratio. On a consolidated basis, total normalized Q2 2026 revenue grew 8% year-over-year (3% organic excluding the confidential contract), with normalized adjusted EBITDA of $161 million (up 8% year-over-year) and a consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.1%, up 70 basis points year-over-year.

Risks & headwinds

- Portfolio risk: The exited remote federal contracts faced unforeseen staffing and supply chain challenges in a difficult remote operating environment that made their risk-return profile unattractive. The firm will no longer pursue new work in this high-risk remote location. - Project risk: The $41 million Q2 charge on the legacy joint venture critical infrastructure project stemmed from a once-in-a-century historic rainfall event that disrupted productivity and increased completion costs. Only three remaining legacy non-managing joint venture projects exist, all winding down by mid-2028, with two performing well, and the firm has not pursued this structure since 2019. - Federal market timing risk: U.S. federal budget uncertainty, continuing resolution risk, procurement backlogs, and government workforce constraints have caused unexpected delays in funding and award timing for won contracts, and contract protests can push revenue recognition out unexpectedly. - Geopolitical risk: Ongoing conflict in the Middle East creates uncertainty around long-term project timing, even though current performance and demand remain strong. Large post-conflict reconstruction opportunities have high uncertainty around timing and scope. - Working capital risk: Proactive pre-purchasing of memory and storage inventory for high-priority national security products temporarily reduced Q2 operating cash flow, though this investment is expected to generate revenue and cash in future quarters.

Analyst Q&A

  • Q: What triggered the decision to divest the CETA and remote federal contracts, and when will current timing-related headwinds resolve? /

    A: The CETA divestiture was driven by a required choice between advisory work and higher-value large development work for a key intelligence customer; the development opportunity is 8-10x larger with stronger margins, making the trade favorable for long-term shareholder value. The remote contracts became unattractive as operating challenges (staffing, supply chain, remote location) made their risk-return profile unacceptable, requiring disproportionate management attention. Management expects current timing-related headwinds to resolve over the next 1-2 years, with long-term mid-single digit growth and continued margin expansion still on track.

  • Q: Are the large Q2 charges indicative of an ongoing pattern of risk, or are they one-time events? /

    A: All Q2 charges are one-time events. The weather-related joint venture charge stems from a once-in-a-century event on a legacy project the firm would not pursue today, as it stopped pursuing this consortium structure in 2019; the project is 90% complete by year-end. The remote contract write-down is an anomaly, as the firm’s core federal business has consistently strong operational performance, and it will no longer bid work in that high-risk remote location. The core portfolio’s strong track record (23 straight quarters of 1.0+ book-to-bill, >60% win rate, 5 straight quarters of 10%+ margins in critical infrastructure) supports that these are not systemic risks.

  • Q: How does the $300 million full-year revenue guidance reduction break down across the business segments? /

    A: Of the $300 million midpoint reduction, $85 million comes from the divested contracts. The remaining $215 million is split $125 million for critical infrastructure and $90 million for federal solutions. 50-60% of the critical infrastructure reduction is low-margin pass-through revenue that actually improves segment margins, with the rest from timing of new large project awards. For the federal reduction, ~$20 million comes from the contract protest, with the remaining amount from delayed funding and task order timing on already awarded work.

  • Q: What is the current demand and outlook for the Middle East business amid ongoing regional conflict? /

    A: All 7,500 regional employees are safe, and operations remain largely business as usual. There has been no slowdown in awards (1.1x book-to-bill in Q2) and no force majeure claims. Regional long-term investment plans (PIF 2026-2030) align fully with Parsons’ core capabilities across tourism, urban development, clean energy, and infrastructure. New post-conflict security opportunities (integrated air/missile defense, border security, counter-UAS, critical infrastructure protection) are emerging, and long-term post-conflict reconstruction could represent a $5-10 billion annual addressable market for the firm, though timing and scope remain uncertain.